This article will be permanently flagged as inappropriate and made unaccessible to everyone. Are you certain this article is inappropriate? Excessive Violence Sexual Content Political / Social
Email Address:
Article Id: WHEBN0002716887 Reproduction Date:
The Atheist's Wager, formulated by the philosopher Michael Martin and published in his 1990 book Atheism: A Philosophical Justification, is an atheistic response to Pascal's Wager regarding the existence of God.
One version of the Atheist's Wager suggests that since a kind and loving god would reward good deeds – and that if no gods exist, good deeds would still leave a positive legacy – one should live a good life without religion.[1][2] Another formulation suggests that a god may reward honest disbelief, a reward which would then be jeopardized by a dishonest belief in the divine.[3]
The Wager states that if you were to analyze your options in regard to how to live your life, you would come out with the following possibilities:[1][4][5]
The following table shows the values assigned to each possible outcome:
Given these values, Martin argues that the option to live a good life clearly dominates the option of living an evil life, regardless of belief in a god.
Buddhism, Irreligion, Epistemology, Hinduism, Criticism of religion
Atheism, Religion, Gnosticism, God, Theism
Richard Dawkins, Religion, Christopher Hitchens, Atheism, David Hume
Islam, Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Philosophy
Atheism, Irreligion, Nontheism, Criticism of religion, Epistemology
Atheism, God, Metaphysics, Religion, Theism
Atheism, Problem of evil, God, Religion, Antireligion
Atheism, Problem of evil, Religion, Theism, Theology
Religion, Metaphysics, Theology, Atheism, Gnosticism